MAIN MENU
Shaheen and Nafisa Khan allege assault at Saket police station, raising press-freedom and police-accountability questions
A reposted reel shows 4PM journalist Shaheen Khan alleging that she and Nafisa Khan were beaten at Delhi’s Saket Police Station after reporting near an event attended by Amit Shah and CM Rekha Gupta, and that the treatment worsened after police learnt they were Muslim. Delhi Police acknowledges the detention but denies assault and religious targeting; press bodies have demanded an independent inquiry and CCTV preservation, leaving the alleged beating and motive unresolved.
An Instagram reel reposted by @journalist_fiza shows journalist Shaheen Khan speaking from Saket Police Station and displaying marks she says were caused by police batons. The repost’s caption invokes the government’s “Beti Bachao” slogan, but the underlying video makes a more specific allegation: Shaheen says she and her sister and colleague Nafisa Khan were detained and assaulted after trying to report around a September 3, 2026 event in Saket attended by Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta.
Shaheen alleges that police personnel beat and slapped the two women and that the treatment intensified after officers learnt that they were Muslim. She links the detention to their attempt to ask questions of the Chief Minister. The video and later interviews document the journalists making these allegations and show visible marks, but they do not by themselves establish who caused the injuries, the motive for any force used, or the full sequence inside the station.
What is independently established
Multiple news organisations reported that Shaheen Khan and Nafisa Khan, associated with 4PM News Network, were detained while covering or recording near the inauguration of a new wing at Max Smart Super Speciality Hospital in Saket on September 3. Delhi Police acknowledged that the women were taken to the local police station, but denied the assault and religious-targeting allegations. Police said their scooter was obstructing a designated VVIP route and that they did not comply with repeated instructions to move it.
The competing accounts therefore leave an important evidentiary boundary. The detention is not in dispute, while the alleged beating inside Saket Police Station and the allegation that religion intensified it remain contested. The journalists have sought preservation and release of CCTV footage, which could provide stronger evidence about what happened inside the station.
Why the incident matters beyond the viral clip
The public-interest issue is not the repost’s slogan or its engagement. It is accountability when police exercise coercive power over journalists engaged in newsgathering around a high-security public event. Several press organisations—including the Press Club of India, Indian Women’s Press Corps, Delhi Union of Journalists, Press Association, Network of Women in Media, India, and Editors Guild of India—called for an impartial investigation or action after the allegations emerged.
This response gives the incident significance for press freedom and police accountability without proving the journalists’ full account. A security justification for moving people or vehicles from a protected route does not, on its own, resolve what occurred after detention. Conversely, visible injuries and the journalists’ consistent accounts do not independently prove the alleged religious motive. CCTV, station records, medical evidence, witness testimony and an independent investigation are the material evidence needed to resolve those questions.
Where the record stands
By September 9, reporting said the journalists had submitted a written complaint but no FIR had been registered on their allegations. By September 10–11, press and civil-society groups were still calling for an independent inquiry and preservation of CCTV footage. IndiaFiles found no later authoritative public finding, as of September 15, establishing responsibility or a religion-based motive.
Conclusion: The reel accurately captures Shaheen Khan publicly alleging assault and religious targeting after detention by Delhi Police, and the underlying detention and subsequent institutional controversy are independently documented. The assault and discriminatory-motive allegations remain disputed and require independent evidence. The unresolved question is therefore one of institutional accountability: whether evidence from inside the police station will be preserved, disclosed and assessed through a credible process.
