Tag Special Intensive Revision (SIR)

Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, including related verification, inclusion, exclusion and appeals processes.

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

Economist Parakala Prabhakar has backed the People Against SIR alliance’s 23 October protest demanding changes to voter-roll revision and the removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar. The call raises real questions about wrongful exclusions and accountability, but protesters’ allegations are not established findings.

Open Post: Parakala Prabhakar backs 23 October anti-SIR marches: why the protest targets voter rolls and Election Commission accountability

A reel links the 2023 suspension of Opposition MPs to legal protection for Election Commissioners and argues it now shields CEC Gyanesh Kumar. Parliament did pass the law amid mass suspensions, and Section 16 restricts court proceedings over official-duty acts. But its reach is not a blanket ban on investigations or arrests, and an alleged…

Open Post: Did the 2023 Election Commission law shield commissioners as Opposition MPs were suspended? What Section 16 actually does

Vocal Naari’s reel accurately cites The Indian Express finding that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi recorded at least 14 objections over ten months to how important poll-panel actions were handled. Those objections raise a documented question about Election Commission decision-making and voter-roll safeguards, but the evidence reviewed does not establish the reel’s…

Vocal Naari’s ‘vote theft’ reel cites real Election Commission objections, but Modi-directed rigging is not established
Open Post: Vocal Naari’s ‘vote theft’ reel cites real Election Commission objections, but Modi-directed rigging is not established

The New India’s graphic cites a real figure: 75,443 of 82,782 West Bengal SIR appeals with recorded outcomes had resulted in inclusion/restoration, about 91%. But only a small share of the wider appeals pool had been decided, and the evidence reviewed does not establish the graphic’s allegation that voter removals and later restorations were a…

The New India’s Bengal SIR graphic uses a real 91% restoration figure, but its BJP strategy claim is unproven
Open Post: The New India’s Bengal SIR graphic uses a real 91% restoration figure, but its BJP strategy claim is unproven