Home

Website is still under active development & open for suggestions. Content posting will accelerate once development is over.

IndiaFiles is an independent, community-driven research and documentation platform that examines & investigates public-interest issues and explains their wider context and consequences. You can contribute as an approved contributor through editorial review, or ask IndiaFiles GPT to research and, where appropriate, publish automatically after analysis.

Our purpose is to build a reliable, evidence-based public record—not promote of a narrative. Facts, allegations and opinions are clearly distinguished; contributors’ views are their own. Factual corrections and credible new evidence are always welcome.

CONTRIBUTE

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

Fuel prices rose since 2014; the reel does not establish the full change in household cost of living

Delhi petrol and diesel were higher in August 2026 than in April 2014, but a viral 2014-versus-2026 reel mixes selected prices with a broader claim about household inflation. LPG comparisons change sharply depending on subsidy basis, precious metals are not consumer-inflation measures, and nominal price changes alone do not show whether households became better or…

Open Post: Fuel prices rose since 2014; the reel does not establish the full change in household cost of living

Epstein messages show repeated India access brokerage; Modi’s authorisation is unproven

Released records show Anil Ambani seeking Jeffrey Epstein’s help to reach Trump-world figures in 2017 and Epstein trying to broker Steve Bannon access after Modi’s 2019 re-election. The sequence documents a recurring informal access channel, but the reviewed evidence does not show Modi directly authorising Epstein or establish that the proposed Bannon meeting occurred.

Open Post: Epstein messages show repeated India access brokerage; Modi’s authorisation is unproven

Authentic Manish Kashyap clips show a real political reversal, but the 2026 reel compresses the timeline

Prime India's August 2026 reel uses authentic material to show a real contrast between Manish Kashyap's older anti-leader and public-asset rhetoric and his May 2024 interview after joining the BJP. But he quit the BJP in June 2025 and joined Jan Suraaj in July, so the edit can imply an outdated political affiliation; its asset-sale…

Open Post: Authentic Manish Kashyap clips show a real political reversal, but the 2026 reel compresses the timeline

Punjab Army-school language policy was reportedly rolled back; ‘anti-Punjab’ motive remains unproven

May 2026 school communications showed Sanskrit compulsory and Punjabi opt-in/additional in at least some Punjab Army Public Schools, prompting protests and Bhagwant Mann’s claim of an “anti-Punjab” Union policy. A 7 August report says AWES withdrew that arrangement for Classes VI–VIII and restored a Punjabi-or-Sanskrit choice; no reviewed evidence proves BJP or Union-government political intent,…

Open Post: Punjab Army-school language policy was reportedly rolled back; ‘anti-Punjab’ motive remains unproven

Viral 2047 satire stitches authentic Modi speeches from 2014–2026 into one escalating timeline

The reel’s 60-month, 50-day, five-year, 2035 and 2047 lines are all traceable to separate real Narendra Modi speeches, not invented dialogue. Its satire works by collapsing unrelated campaign promises, demonetisation rhetoric, a 2023 Telangana pledge, a 2025 security target and a 2026 Viksit Bharat goal into one sequence; the composite is not documentary evidence that…

Open Post: Viral 2047 satire stitches authentic Modi speeches from 2014–2026 into one escalating timeline

India has documented democratic-institution concerns; a Nazi-equivalence reel still overstates what the evidence proves

The reel points toward real, independently documented concerns about press freedom, treatment of critics, investigative-agency selectivity and contested curriculum changes in India. But Nazi Germany abolished competitive politics and built a racial one-party dictatorship that culminated in mass persecution and genocide; matching selected institutional concerns does not establish equivalence with that regime. The defensible issue…

Open Post: India has documented democratic-institution concerns; a Nazi-equivalence reel still overstates what the evidence proves

India still exports buffalo meat at scale; the Modi ‘beef’ contradiction depends on terminology and context

Modi’s 2012 criticism of India’s ‘beef export’ position referred to a trade category that international datasets use for buffalo meat; Indian policy prohibits cow, ox and calf beef exports while permitting boneless buffalo meat. That export trade did not disappear under Modi: APEDA reports $5.10 billion of buffalo-meat exports in 2025–26 and calls India the…

Open Post: India still exports buffalo meat at scale; the Modi ‘beef’ contradiction depends on terminology and context

Modi’s file-reading account documents a briefing-led work style; it does not prove incompetence or lack of education

In a 2013 interview, Narendra Modi described initially leaving a stack of sensitive Gujarat files unread, asking officials to explain the issues and relying on briefings, listening and rapid scanning. That is direct evidence about the working method he chose to describe, not evidence that he never read official records, made uninformed decisions or lacked…

Open Post: Modi’s file-reading account documents a briefing-led work style; it does not prove incompetence or lack of education

Lok Sabha clash documents interruptions and disputed floor control; it does not establish Speaker bias

Rahul Gandhi’s 29 July 2026 complaint that Treasury benches repeatedly interrupted him is authentic, and contemporaneous reporting confirms a disorderly Lok Sabha exchange in which some of his remarks were expunged. The stronger issue is procedural neutrality and opposition speaking space: the episode merits scrutiny, but one sitting does not prove Congress’s claim of systematic…

Open Post: Lok Sabha clash documents interruptions and disputed floor control; it does not establish Speaker bias

Trending now

Was criticism freer and governance stronger under Congress? A viral comparison mixes real achievements with sweeping claims