Period 2026

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

At the 12 October 2026 Delhi march over electoral-roll changes, women protesters and opposition supporters accused police of rough treatment while dispersing crowds. The footage raises a specific question: how far may police go to control a restricted protest, and what evidence is needed to assess allegations of excessive force?

Open Post: Women protesters challenge Delhi Policeโ€™s use of force during 12 October INDIA bloc march

A reporter at the 16 October 2026 Connaught Place march says a counter-gathering chanted for โ€˜traitorsโ€™ to be shot. The allegation remains independently unconfirmed, but the documented counter-protest, police restrictions and electoral-roll dispute expose a central democratic distinction: questioning authorities is not disloyalty, and political disagreement cannot justify threats of violence.

Open Post: At Delhiโ€™s Tiranga March, an alleged โ€˜shoot the traitorsโ€™ slogan raises a question about dissent and intimidation

After Delhi Police removed Jantar Mantar as a designated protest venue, a protester argued that shifting demonstrations away from central institutions makes dissent easier to ignore. Three alternative grounds, competing court positions and a pending Supreme Court challenge show why the real issue is whether protest remains accessible, visible and fairly regulated.

Open Post: Jantar Mantar loses protest-site status: Why moving Delhi’s demonstrations raises a question of visibility and rights

A 15 October 2026 confrontation near Shankar Market captures a sharper dispute: protesters say they were denied space to assemble peacefully, while Delhi Police cites security and public-order restrictions. The removal of Jantar Mantar as a protest venue has brought the balance between policing and democratic dissent under Supreme Court scrutiny.

Open Post: At Connaught Place, students challenge Delhi Police over blocked peaceful protest and Jantar Mantar restrictions

Rajasthanโ€™s 16 August 2026 order made government-school visits and recording subject to permission just as a citizen school-inspection campaign gathered attention. Childrenโ€™s privacy warrants protection, but the broad discretion given to principals raises a real accountability question; the political motive alleged by critics remains unproved.

Open Post: Rajasthanโ€™s school filming restrictions after โ€˜School Thik Karoโ€™: child privacy versus public scrutiny

BDL invited Aindri Defence Advisory, founded by its former CMD and his wife, to bid for 300 missile optical sights without competition. The โ‚น56.8 crore bid had cleared technical evaluation but was not yet a confirmed final award, raising serious questions about urgency, supplier capacity and conflict-of-interest safeguards.

Open Post: BDLโ€™s โ‚น56.8 Crore Missile-Sight Tender: Why a Former Chiefโ€™s Family Firm Was the Only Bidder

PNCโ€™s records document around โ‚น282 crore in six early-completion bonus amounts, though an entitlement is not always a confirmed payment. The Kanpurโ€“Lucknow Expressway later suffered serious defects. The evidence demands scrutiny of road-quality oversight, not an unsupported claim that the bonuses caused the failure or financed a political party.

Open Post: PNCโ€™s โ‚น282-Crore Highway Bonuses and the Kanpurโ€“Lucknow Road Failure: What the Records Show

A clip shared on 18 October 2026 urges Shah Rukh Khan, Aamir Khan and Akshay Kumar to speak up about poor roads and footpaths. Indiaโ€™s pedestrian death figures show why the underlying issue matters, even as the starsโ€™ motives and the impact of celebrity advocacy remain unproven.

Open Post: Dhruv Ratheeโ€™s appeal to Bollywood stars: Can celebrity influence help improve Indiaโ€™s roads and public spaces?

After Delhi Police refused permission for the 10 October CJP protest, an Instagram speaker questioned the scale of police deployment and urged citizens to write to the Chief Justice. The refusal is documented, but policing figures need date-specific checks and an email is not itself an Article 32 writ petition. The dispute tests how public-order…

Open Post: Delhi protest restrictions and the call to approach the Supreme Court: what Article 32 canโ€”and cannotโ€”do