MAIN MENU
Entity Supreme Court of India
India’s apex constitutional court.
A viral political list names lynchings, rapists being celebrated, demolitions, disasters and restrictions on dissent under the BJP–RSS. Court rulings and official records substantiate serious examples, but do not prove every charge or a single cause. The central question is how authorities and society respond when abuses occur.
GEOGRPAHY : India
TYPE : Analysis
EVIDENCE : partly-verified
PERIOD : After 2014
UPDATED : 22 Oct 26 / 11:02 am
No comments on Have mob violence, bulldozer demolitions and public failures become normalised in India? What the evidence shows
The Allahabad High Court suspended Nandlal Rai’s murder conviction and life sentence during appeal after considering his plans to contest the 2027 Uttar Pradesh election. The ruling removes a major electoral disqualification for now, but leaves serious questions about exceptional relief, the murder case and equal treatment before the law.
ENTITIES : Allahabad High Court, Nandlal Rai (Babloo Rai), Pramod Kumar Nigam, Supreme Court of India
GEOGRPAHY : Uttar Pradesh
TYPE : Analysis
EVIDENCE : Context verified
UPDATED : 21 Oct 26 / 2:03 pm
A statement shared by Kunal Kamra on 15 October 2026 disputes the portrayal of Umar Khalid as a terrorist, compares his treatment with Kapil Mishra’s and questions six years of detention without trial. Court records show a serious wider-conspiracy prosecution, repeated bail refusals and an unresolved question about liberty before conviction.
A lawyer at Delhi’s October 2026 protest confrontation demanded the written Section 163 order and challenged officers carrying a heavy wooden stick. The exchange raises a concrete question about lawful protest restrictions, police identification and force—but the reel alone does not prove the officers acted illegally.
After Delhi Police removed Jantar Mantar as a designated protest venue, a protester argued that shifting demonstrations away from central institutions makes dissent easier to ignore. Three alternative grounds, competing court positions and a pending Supreme Court challenge show why the real issue is whether protest remains accessible, visible and fairly regulated.
After Delhi Police refused permission for the 10 October CJP protest, an Instagram speaker questioned the scale of police deployment and urged citizens to write to the Chief Justice. The refusal is documented, but policing figures need date-specific checks and an email is not itself an Article 32 writ petition. The dispute tests how public-order…
Amit Shah was required to stay outside Gujarat after receiving bail in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case in 2010. Court records explain the order, his 2014 discharge and why allegations about Judge B. H. Loya’s death must not be treated as proven.
TAGS : Sohrabuddin Sheikh case
GEOGRPAHY : Gujarat
TYPE : Analysis
EVIDENCE : Partially Verified
UPDATED : 19 Oct 26 / 2:34 pm
The Supreme Court's March 2023 interim panel included the Chief Justice of India. Parliament's later law replaced the CJI with a Cabinet minister nominated by the Prime Minister, giving the government side two of three seats. What the change means for independent elections, and where the 2026 court challenge stands.
From the 2023 election-commissioner appointment and legal-protection framework to voter-roll disputes, Delhi's CJP protests, detentions, the Tiranga March and a London demonstration, these connected records examine electoral accountability and the treatment of peaceful dissent. Verified restrictions and reported internal objections do not by themselves prove deliberate vote theft or politically directed suppression.
TAGS : Police Accountability, Election Commission independence, Right to Peaceful Protest, Election integrity, Freedom of expression, election-commission, Press Freedom
ENTITIES : Gyanesh Kumar, Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), Delhi Police, Election Commission of India, Supreme Court of India
EVIDENCE : Partially Verified
RANKINGS : Featured
CHECKOUT : CJP (Cockroach Janta Party)
UPDATED : 21 Oct 26 / 12:10 pm