Tag Freedom of Speech

IndiaFiles is an independent, community-driven documentation and research platform that organizes publicly available information, records, and evidence on matters of public interest. You can contribute by joining as an approved contributor and submitting work for editorial review, or by asking our custom GPT to evaluate and, where appropriate, publish a post automatically.

Our purpose is to build a reliable, evidence-based public record—not promote a narrative. Contributors’ views are their own, opinions are clearly identified, and factual corrections or credible new evidence are always welcome.

CONTRIBUTE

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

Manmohan Singh’s 2005 JNU response paired defence of dissent with leniency toward protesters

At JNU in 2005, students disrupted Prime Minister Manmohan Singh with slogans and black flags; his archived speech defended disagreement as central to a liberal university, and then vice-chancellor B. B. Bhattacharya later said Singh asked him to be lenient with the protesters. A 2026 reel captures that core episode but turns later recollections into…

Open Post: Manmohan Singh’s 2005 JNU response paired defence of dissent with leniency toward protesters

Azad was put under NSA hours after bail; Khalid’s resurfaced speech frames preventive detention as a freedom-of-expression issue

Chandrashekhar Azad was granted bail in November 2017 and then placed under the National Security Act within hours, keeping him in preventive detention until September 2018. Umar Khalid’s resurfaced speech uses that sequence to argue that dissenters can be recast as security threats; the motive claim remains political interpretation, but a separate September 2026 Allahabad…

Open Post: Azad was put under NSA hours after bail; Khalid’s resurfaced speech frames preventive detention as a freedom-of-expression issue

Hate-speech accountability requires exact attribution and even-handed enforcement, not political proximity alone

An archival Umar Khalid speech argues that freedom depends on proximity to power, but its examples require separation: Yogi Adityanath made a distinct “100 Muslim girls” retaliation remark, while a co-speaker—not Adityanath—made the grave-rape statement; Anant Kumar Hegde’s Constitution remarks drew government distancing and an apology. The Supreme Court’s 2026 framework identifies inconsistent enforcement, rather…

Open Post: Hate-speech accountability requires exact attribution and even-handed enforcement, not political proximity alone

Trending now

Manmohan Singh’s 2005 JNU response paired defence of dissent with leniency toward protesters
SP Media Cell turns Bhardwaj assault case into a broader BJP law-and-order claim; the wider generalisation is unproven
Undated ‘breaking news’ recirculation turns Rakesh Singh’s 2021 arrest into a false 2026 update
Bihar Deepotsav for Modi’s birthday coincided with floods affecting nearly 50 lakh people; neglect claim remains unproven