Period 2017

IndiaFiles is an independent, community-driven documentation and research platform that organizes publicly available information, records, and evidence on matters of public interest. You can contribute by joining as an approved contributor and submitting work for editorial review, or by asking our custom GPT to evaluate and, where appropriate, publish a post automatically.

Our purpose is to build a reliable, evidence-based public record—not promote a narrative. Contributors’ views are their own, opinions are clearly identified, and factual corrections or credible new evidence are always welcome.

CONTRIBUTE

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

The 2G record is not resolved by a single “scam” or “no scam” verdict. The 2017 criminal acquittals remain operative, while the Supreme Court separately held the 2008 licence-allocation process illegal and quashed it; the ₹1.76-lakh-crore figure was a presumptive audit estimate, not proven stolen cash. Keeping those findings distinct is essential to understanding what…

Open Post: The 2G record contains both criminal acquittals and a Supreme Court finding that the 2008 licences were illegal

Chandrashekhar Azad was granted bail in November 2017 and then placed under the National Security Act within hours, keeping him in preventive detention until September 2018. Umar Khalid’s resurfaced speech uses that sequence to argue that dissenters can be recast as security threats; the motive claim remains political interpretation, but a separate September 2026 Allahabad…

Open Post: Azad was put under NSA hours after bail; Khalid’s resurfaced speech frames preventive detention as a freedom-of-expression issue

An archival Umar Khalid speech argues that freedom depends on proximity to power, but its examples require separation: Yogi Adityanath made a distinct “100 Muslim girls” retaliation remark, while a co-speaker—not Adityanath—made the grave-rape statement; Anant Kumar Hegde’s Constitution remarks drew government distancing and an apology. The Supreme Court’s 2026 framework identifies inconsistent enforcement, rather…

Open Post: Hate-speech accountability requires exact attribution and even-handed enforcement, not political proximity alone

An August 2026 reel republishes an undated post-demonetisation Umar Khalid speech in which he challenges proof that he personally raised anti-India slogans, points to economic hardship and alleges a government diversion strategy. The reviewed record distinguishes those claims: JNU proceedings documented event-related conduct without making the political label itself an adjudicated fact, official evidence supports…

Open Post: ‘Deshdrohi’ label blurred slogan attribution; demonetisation caused disruption, but diversion motive remains unproven