MAIN MENU
Entity Delhi High Court
High Court of Delhi.
A statement shared by Kunal Kamra on 15 October 2026 disputes the portrayal of Umar Khalid as a terrorist, compares his treatment with Kapil Mishra’s and questions six years of detention without trial. Court records show a serious wider-conspiracy prosecution, repeated bail refusals and an unresolved question about liberty before conviction.
No comments on Umar Khalid’s prison statement challenges the terror label as his Delhi riots trial remains pending
A woman at Delhi’s 16 October 2026 Tiranga March recalled joining anti-corruption protests before the BJP came to power and questioned today’s detentions. Records show police crackdowns under both governments, while the 2026 arrests and women’s justice protests raise fresh questions about necessary limits on peaceful dissent.
The 2G record is not resolved by a single “scam” or “no scam” verdict. The 2017 criminal acquittals remain operative, while the Supreme Court separately held the 2008 licence-allocation process illegal and quashed it; the ₹1.76-lakh-crore figure was a presumptive audit estimate, not proven stolen cash. Keeping those findings distinct is essential to understanding what…
ENTITIES : 2G spectrum allocation case, A. Raja, Anna Hazare, Arvind Kejriwal, Baba Ramdev, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Delhi High Court, Kiran Bedi, Narendra Modi, Subramanian Swamy, Supreme Court of India, Vinod Rai
UPDATED : 13 Sep 26 / 11:33 am
The 2025 Delhi High Court refusal was not the end of the bail story: in January 2026 the Supreme Court granted bail to five co-accused but kept Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in custody after an accused-specific UAPA assessment. Their renewed appeals remain pending, highlighting the unresolved tension between prolonged pre-trial detention, Article 21 liberty…