Evidence Partially Verified

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

Sonam Wangchuk was detained under the National Security Act after the September 2025 Leh violence, while the government alleged his statements helped incite unrest and Wangchuk denied responsibility. The Centre revoked the detention in March 2026 without a court ruling on its legality; later interviews show Wangchuk responding to being called “anti-national”, but that label…

Open Post: Wangchuk’s detention was real and later revoked; ‘anti-national’ remains a political label, not a legal finding

Mohan Bhagwat has repeatedly used inclusive language about religious and social communities, including in independently reported 2026 speeches, while the viral reel records him describing personal ties with Christians, Adivasis, Buddhists and Bohras. The broader outreach is verifiable, but the reel’s biographical relationship claims are mostly self-description, and inclusive rhetoric does not by itself establish…

Open Post: Bhagwat’s outreach language is documented; personal community ties remain largely self-described

The 2026 Ayodhya Ram Temple donation investigation found prima facie evidence of cash theft and serious weaknesses in counting, CCTV and supervision, leading to an FIR and arrests. But the viral reel turns that specific accountability failure into a broader argument against donating to temples; the evidence supports scrutiny of donation governance, not a general…

Open Post: Ayodhya donation probe found theft indicators and control failures; it did not prove a general case against temple giving

The New Youth reel asks what children received under BJP rule, but neither its caption nor the viral comments define a measurable scorecard. Free NFSA foodgrain is a real household entitlement—5 kg per person for Priority Households, 35 kg per AAY household—but it is only one food-security input. Assessing what children gained requires separate evidence…

Open Post: A viral ‘what did your child get?’ question cannot be answered by 5 kg ration alone

Nitin Gadkari’s 2023 ₹15-per-litre line is authentic, so a blanket denial that he used the figure is untenable. But the figure came from a claimed comparison involving ethanol and electricity in a hybrid/flex-fuel vehicle, not a notified ₹15 retail-petrol price. The 2026 Congress edit exposes the wording contradiction while omitting his immediate explanation; neither the…

Open Post: Gadkari did say ₹15/litre; the disputed part is what that number represented

Delhi petrol and diesel were higher in August 2026 than in April 2014, but a viral 2014-versus-2026 reel mixes selected prices with a broader claim about household inflation. LPG comparisons change sharply depending on subsidy basis, precious metals are not consumer-inflation measures, and nominal price changes alone do not show whether households became better or…

Open Post: Fuel prices rose since 2014; the reel does not establish the full change in household cost of living

May 2026 school communications showed Sanskrit compulsory and Punjabi opt-in/additional in at least some Punjab Army Public Schools, prompting protests and Bhagwant Mann’s claim of an “anti-Punjab” Union policy. A 7 August report says AWES withdrew that arrangement for Classes VI–VIII and restored a Punjabi-or-Sanskrit choice; no reviewed evidence proves BJP or Union-government political intent,…

Open Post: Punjab Army-school language policy was reportedly rolled back; ‘anti-Punjab’ motive remains unproven

The reel points toward real, independently documented concerns about press freedom, treatment of critics, investigative-agency selectivity and contested curriculum changes in India. But Nazi Germany abolished competitive politics and built a racial one-party dictatorship that culminated in mass persecution and genocide; matching selected institutional concerns does not establish equivalence with that regime. The defensible issue…

Open Post: India has documented democratic-institution concerns; a Nazi-equivalence reel still overstates what the evidence proves