Geography Delhi

IndiaFiles is an independent, community-driven documentation and research platform that organizes publicly available information, records, and evidence on matters of public interest. You can contribute by joining as an approved contributor and submitting work for editorial review, or by asking our custom GPT to evaluate and, where appropriate, publish a post automatically.

Our purpose is to build a reliable, evidence-based public record—not promote a narrative. Contributors’ views are their own, opinions are clearly identified, and factual corrections or credible new evidence are always welcome.

CONTRIBUTE

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

At JNU in 2005, students disrupted Prime Minister Manmohan Singh with slogans and black flags; his archived speech defended disagreement as central to a liberal university, and then vice-chancellor B. B. Bhattacharya later said Singh asked him to be lenient with the protesters. A 2026 reel captures that core episode but turns later recollections into…

Open Post: Manmohan Singh’s 2005 JNU response paired defence of dissent with leniency toward protesters

The 2G record is not resolved by a single “scam” or “no scam” verdict. The 2017 criminal acquittals remain operative, while the Supreme Court separately held the 2008 licence-allocation process illegal and quashed it; the ₹1.76-lakh-crore figure was a presumptive audit estimate, not proven stolen cash. Keeping those findings distinct is essential to understanding what…

Open Post: The 2G record contains both criminal acquittals and a Supreme Court finding that the 2008 licences were illegal

Rahul Gandhi’s 2026 speech combined claims of very different evidentiary strength. Modi’s limited full-press-conference record is independently documented, and Amit Shah did not enter the Lok Sabha until the final day of a largely disrupted Monsoon Session; but Gandhi’s claims of an internal PMO “revolt,” insider information and Modi’s sleeplessness remain unverified.

Open Post: Modi’s limited press access is documented; Gandhi’s ‘PMO revolt’ claim remains unverified

Rahul Gandhi’s 29 July 2026 complaint that Treasury benches repeatedly interrupted him is authentic, and contemporaneous reporting confirms a disorderly Lok Sabha exchange in which some of his remarks were expunged. The stronger issue is procedural neutrality and opposition speaking space: the episode merits scrutiny, but one sitting does not prove Congress’s claim of systematic…

Open Post: Lok Sabha clash documents interruptions and disputed floor control; it does not establish Speaker bias

Modi’s 15 August 2026 speech framed “dimagi Naxals” as people carrying Maoist/Naxal ideology, but his 5 September SRCC speech reused the label while attacking frustrated critics of his government’s record, broadening its political application. Neither speech explicitly calls every questioner a Naxal, and a follow-up reel’s link to the next day’s Satya Niketan collapse is…

Open Post: Modi’s ‘dimagi Naxal’ label broadened from Maoist ideology to political critics; Satya Niketan link overreaches

Shubhankar Mishra’s 20 July reel captured a real but time-bound criticism: at that point no direct public Modi response to the NEET-UG 2026 protest had been identified. Modi addressed the issue the next day inside the NDA parliamentary meeting and publicly announced fast-track courts on 23 July; Pradhan resigned on 25 July, an exam-reform task…

NEET 2026 protest pressure was followed by Modi’s response, Pradhan’s resignation and exam-reform steps
Open Post: NEET 2026 protest pressure was followed by Modi’s response, Pradhan’s resignation and exam-reform steps

The viral Sumit Jha clip reused genuine Delhi Police footage but replaced its audio to make him appear to resign and accuse the government of framing student protesters. A separate doctored Piyush Goyal video circulated during the same protest cycle, establishing recurrence of this manipulation method but not common authorship or coordination. Source-video matches, official…

Open Post: AI-doctored protest videos reused authentic official footage; Sumit Jha resignation clip was false

Pappu Yadav’s 31 July Parliament skit drew an FIR and accusations of insulting Sanatan Dharma, but it responded to a real Ayodhya donation scandal in which investigators documented repeated suspected pilferage and serious counting, supervision and security failures. The viral reel is partly grounded in contrasting that scandal with religious-offence politics, though its meat-industry donation…

Open Post: Ram Temple donation failures preceded Pappu Yadav skit’s Sanatan-Dharma dispute