Period 2026

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

Rahul Gandhiโ€™s 2026 speech combined claims of very different evidentiary strength. Modiโ€™s limited full-press-conference record is independently documented, and Amit Shah did not enter the Lok Sabha until the final day of a largely disrupted Monsoon Session; but Gandhiโ€™s claims of an internal PMO โ€œrevolt,โ€ insider information and Modiโ€™s sleeplessness remain unverified.

Open Post: Modiโ€™s limited press access is documented; Gandhiโ€™s โ€˜PMO revoltโ€™ claim remains unverified

Haryanaโ€™s 2026 Rajya Sabha election produced a documented Congress cross-voting dispute and later suspensions of five MLAs. Birender Singhโ€™s โ‚น50 crore remark is authentic, and MLA Naresh Selwal separately alleged offers of up to โ‚น25 crore, but repeated political allegations do not establish that BJP actually paid or offered those sums to a named legislator;…

Open Post: Haryana cross-voting was documented; โ‚น25โ€“50 crore BJP inducement claims remain allegations

Saayoni Ghosh did leave the TMC camp and align with the BJP-led NDA, but the evidence identifies her as joining the NCPI bloc rather than formally becoming a BJP member. That distinction later became part of a Lok Sabha/Supreme Court anti-defection dispute, while the reel also overstates a separate 2015 Shivling controversy by treating disputed…

Open Post: Saayoni Ghosh joined NCPI, not BJP; that distinction now matters in a live defection dispute

This draft duplicates published IndiaFiles Post 85641, which already archives the same @its_____your_____khushi reel and the April 2026 Yogi Adityanath slogan controversy. Reprocessing confirms a real initial misattribution to Swami Vivekananda followed by a near-immediate reference to Netaji; the durable issue is selective clipping, not a separate publishable event.

Open Post: Duplicate draft: Yogi Adityanathโ€™s 2026 slogan-attribution controversy is already documented

Multiple August 2026 reports said the Uttar Pradesh government was considering up to โ‚น50,000 in assistance for women, but the reports themselves described an unsettled proposal and no reviewed Cabinet decision or scheme rules established a guaranteed benefit. The July Instagram reel predates those reports and its exact speech could not be transcribed, so it…

Open Post: UPโ€™s โ‚น50,000 women-aid plan was reported, not approved; later reporting still described it as a proposal

Sonam Wangchuk was detained under the National Security Act after the September 2025 Leh violence, while the government alleged his statements helped incite unrest and Wangchuk denied responsibility. The Centre revoked the detention in March 2026 without a court ruling on its legality; later interviews show Wangchuk responding to being called โ€œanti-nationalโ€, but that label…

Open Post: Wangchukโ€™s detention was real and later revoked; โ€˜anti-nationalโ€™ remains a political label, not a legal finding

Mohan Bhagwat has repeatedly used inclusive language about religious and social communities, including in independently reported 2026 speeches, while the viral reel records him describing personal ties with Christians, Adivasis, Buddhists and Bohras. The broader outreach is verifiable, but the reelโ€™s biographical relationship claims are mostly self-description, and inclusive rhetoric does not by itself establish…

Open Post: Bhagwatโ€™s outreach language is documented; personal community ties remain largely self-described

The 2026 Ayodhya Ram Temple donation investigation found prima facie evidence of cash theft and serious weaknesses in counting, CCTV and supervision, leading to an FIR and arrests. But the viral reel turns that specific accountability failure into a broader argument against donating to temples; the evidence supports scrutiny of donation governance, not a general…

Open Post: Ayodhya donation probe found theft indicators and control failures; it did not prove a general case against temple giving

The New Youth reel asks what children received under BJP rule, but neither its caption nor the viral comments define a measurable scorecard. Free NFSA foodgrain is a real household entitlementโ€”5 kg per person for Priority Households, 35 kg per AAY householdโ€”but it is only one food-security input. Assessing what children gained requires separate evidence…

Open Post: A viral โ€˜what did your child get?โ€™ question cannot be answered by 5 kg ration alone