Category Democracy

IndiaFiles is an independent, community-driven documentation and research platform that organizes publicly available information, records, and evidence on matters of public interest. You can contribute by joining as an approved contributor and submitting work for editorial review, or by asking our custom GPT to evaluate and, where appropriate, publish a post automatically.

Our purpose is to build a reliable, evidence-based public record—not promote a narrative. Contributors’ views are their own, opinions are clearly identified, and factual corrections or credible new evidence are always welcome.

CONTRIBUTE

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

The CBI’s NEET-UG 2026 case alleges that NTA-appointed subject experts and intermediaries leaked questions from inside the protected paper-setting chain, a breach serious enough to force cancellation of the 3 May exam and a nationwide re-test. A Bharat Drishti reel correctly identified five early arrests but overreached by calling all five BJP workers: reviewed reporting…

Open Post: NEET-UG 2026 leak exposed a breach inside the protected paper-setting system; reel’s BJP claim overreaches

Swatantra Bhardwaj publicly claimed that political connections helped him avoid jail after a June 2026 Jantar Mantar assault. Delhi Police disputed the injury severity and denied interference; he was later arrested and remanded to judicial custody through 21 September, while the self-defence and political-protection claims remain unresolved and no guilt finding has been made.

Open Post: Political-protection claim in Jantar Mantar assault remains unproven; Bhardwaj later remanded to custody

A viral excerpt is authentic, but the full 20 September 2025 NDTV interview shows Rekha Gupta was sarcastically rejecting an EVM-hacking allegation, not admitting that the BJP or ABVP manipulated voting machines. The case demonstrates a specific misinformation mechanism: a genuine political clip can become substantively false when its immediate continuation is removed; it does…

Open Post: Context-stripped Rekha Gupta EVM clip reverses her meaning; it is not evidence of a hacking admission

The Samajwadi Party Media Cell used the real Swatantra Bhardwaj assault controversy to argue that BJP-linked spaces are governed by "goons" and poor law and order. The incident supports scrutiny of political access and policing, but it does not establish a party-wide pattern; Bhardwaj was later arrested and remanded to judicial custody, while political interference…

Open Post: SP Media Cell turns Bhardwaj assault case into a broader BJP law-and-order claim; the wider generalisation is unproven

At JNU in 2005, students disrupted Prime Minister Manmohan Singh with slogans and black flags; his archived speech defended disagreement as central to a liberal university, and then vice-chancellor B. B. Bhattacharya later said Singh asked him to be lenient with the protesters. A 2026 reel captures that core episode but turns later recollections into…

Open Post: Manmohan Singh’s 2005 JNU response paired defence of dissent with leniency toward protesters

The reel’s ₹76,000 crore government-advertising figure is unsupported; reporting based on government data puts central advertising at about ₹5,987.46 crore for 2014-15 to 2024-25. The broader issue is still real: government advertising, concentrated ownership and political alignment are documented media-independence concerns, but this record does not prove that advertising caused favourable coverage or that specific…

Open Post: Government advertising is a real media-independence concern; viral ₹76,000 crore figure is unsupported

Haryana’s 2026 Rajya Sabha election produced a documented Congress cross-voting dispute and later suspensions of five MLAs. Birender Singh’s ₹50 crore remark is authentic, and MLA Naresh Selwal separately alleged offers of up to ₹25 crore, but repeated political allegations do not establish that BJP actually paid or offered those sums to a named legislator;…

Open Post: Haryana cross-voting was documented; ₹25–50 crore BJP inducement claims remain allegations

This draft duplicates published IndiaFiles Post 85641, which already archives the same @its_____your_____khushi reel and the April 2026 Yogi Adityanath slogan controversy. Reprocessing confirms a real initial misattribution to Swami Vivekananda followed by a near-immediate reference to Netaji; the durable issue is selective clipping, not a separate publishable event.

Open Post: Duplicate draft: Yogi Adityanath’s 2026 slogan-attribution controversy is already documented

Multiple August 2026 reports said the Uttar Pradesh government was considering up to ₹50,000 in assistance for women, but the reports themselves described an unsettled proposal and no reviewed Cabinet decision or scheme rules established a guaranteed benefit. The July Instagram reel predates those reports and its exact speech could not be transcribed, so it…

Open Post: UP’s ₹50,000 women-aid plan was reported, not approved; later reporting still described it as a proposal