Evidence Primary Source

Evidence from an original official record, speech, document, or first-party source.

Filters

Category
Tag
Entity
Geography
Type
Evidence
Period
Ranking
Author
Source
Sort by

A viral excerpt is authentic, but the full 20 September 2025 NDTV interview shows Rekha Gupta was sarcastically rejecting an EVM-hacking allegation, not admitting that the BJP or ABVP manipulated voting machines. The case demonstrates a specific misinformation mechanism: a genuine political clip can become substantively false when its immediate continuation is removed; it does…

Open Post: Context-stripped Rekha Gupta EVM clip reverses her meaning; it is not evidence of a hacking admission

A 2024 Indian Express investigation found that 23 of 25 prominent opposition politicians under central-agency scrutiny who later moved to the BJP received some form of reprieve. The pattern raises a legitimate agency-impartiality question and sits in tension with Narendra Modi’s claim that enforcement agencies act independently, but timing alone does not prove that party…

Open Post: Reprieve followed BJP switches in 23 of 25 opposition cases reviewed; political causation remains unproven

The 2G record is not resolved by a single “scam” or “no scam” verdict. The 2017 criminal acquittals remain operative, while the Supreme Court separately held the 2008 licence-allocation process illegal and quashed it; the ₹1.76-lakh-crore figure was a presumptive audit estimate, not proven stolen cash. Keeping those findings distinct is essential to understanding what…

Open Post: The 2G record contains both criminal acquittals and a Supreme Court finding that the 2008 licences were illegal

India’s August 2026 sugar-price surge reflected a real short-term supply squeeze. A newly submitted reel uses Narendra Modi’s 2013 anti-inflation speech to suggest sugar would be ₹15/kg under that standard; the contrast is legitimate accountability context, but ₹15 is an unverifiable counterfactual and the old speech does not explain the 2026 shock.

Open Post: India’s 2026 sugar shock exposed a short-term supply squeeze; old Modi inflation clip is context, not explanation

In ANI's 16 April 2014 interview, Narendra Modi said that if allegations against him over the 2002 Gujarat riots were proven he should face exemplary punishment rather than be forgiven through apology; earlier in the same interview he separately proposed fast-track courts for criminal cases against MPs and MLAs. A 2026 reel merges those exchanges…

Open Post: Modi’s 2014 ANI interview separated punishment for proven guilt from decriminalising politics; viral reel merges the two

12th Fail uses Ambedkar’s authentic 1942 “Educate, Agitate and Organize” call to support a fictional argument that uneducated citizens are easier to manipulate through caste and religion. Ambedkar’s own text frames the slogan as part of a broader struggle for freedom, dignity and emancipation; it does not supply the film’s specific vote-bank claim, showing why…

Open Post: 12th Fail links education to vote-bank politics; Ambedkar’s 1942 call was about emancipation

Narendra Modi’s 2024 recollection of Muslim neighbours is a personal anecdote; Yogi Adityanath’s 2025 claim that Hindu safety changes with the religious composition of a locality is a population-wide generalisation not demonstrated by the interview. NCRB-based parliamentary data recorded zero communal/religious-rioting cases in Uttar Pradesh in 2018–2020, supporting a narrower law-and-order point but not the…

Open Post: Communal safety cannot be inferred from religious headcounts; the Modi-Yogi reels compare an anecdote with a sweeping claim

Rahul Gandhi’s 2026 speech combined claims of very different evidentiary strength. Modi’s limited full-press-conference record is independently documented, and Amit Shah did not enter the Lok Sabha until the final day of a largely disrupted Monsoon Session; but Gandhi’s claims of an internal PMO “revolt,” insider information and Modi’s sleeplessness remain unverified.

Open Post: Modi’s limited press access is documented; Gandhi’s ‘PMO revolt’ claim remains unverified

Nitin Gadkari’s 2023 ₹15-per-litre line is authentic, so a blanket denial that he used the figure is untenable. But the figure came from a claimed comparison involving ethanol and electricity in a hybrid/flex-fuel vehicle, not a notified ₹15 retail-petrol price. The 2026 Congress edit exposes the wording contradiction while omitting his immediate explanation; neither the…

Open Post: Gadkari did say ₹15/litre; the disputed part is what that number represented