MAIN MENU

Filters
A statement shared by Kunal Kamra on 15 October 2026 disputes the portrayal of Umar Khalid as a terrorist, compares his treatment with Kapil Mishraโs and questions six years of detention without trial. Court records show a serious wider-conspiracy prosecution, repeated bail refusals and an unresolved question about liberty before conviction.
Polling-station CCTV: Gyanesh Kumarโs privacy defence and the case for checking late-voting claims
A 2025 political reel disputes the Chief Election Commissionerโs refusal to release polling-station footage, arguing that recordings could test claims about late arrivals. Voter privacy is a legitimate concern, but it does not explain why carefully supervised access, preservation and independent scrutiny should be ruled out.
Nirbhaya Fund and facial recognition at Jantar Mantar: what Delhiโs surveillance records establish
Delhi Police acknowledged using facial recognition on Jantar Mantar protesters, while Nirbhaya-funded Safe City plans include similar technology. The key unresolved issue is whether the specific protest surveillance was funded through that schemeโand what safeguards protect peaceful assembly.
A lawyer at Delhiโs October 2026 protest confrontation demanded the written Section 163 order and challenged officers carrying a heavy wooden stick. The exchange raises a concrete question about lawful protest restrictions, police identification and forceโbut the reel alone does not prove the officers acted illegally.
A reel challenges praise of Manusmriti by citing verses on women's dependence and character. The texts contain both praise for honouring women and rules denying them independenceโan important distinction in India's long struggle for equality.
Bellingcat traced $24.4 million in donor-advised grants within $117.8 million received by Ekal USA and Sewa USA in 2020โ24. The charitiesโ links to RSS-associated organisations raise transparency questions, but the findings do not show that donors funded the RSS itself.
A satirical Instagram comparison points to the BJPโs nearly โน10,000 crore in cash and equivalents in March 2025. Audited filings confirm a large BJPโCongress funding gap, but the postโs Congress balance and party-office counts are not established by the evidence examined. The larger issue is unequal financial capacity and votersโ right to know who funds…
At a London demonstration, Dhruv Rathee challenged restrictions on protests in India and legal protection for election commissioners. The dispute connects concerns over voter-list revisions with the scope of official immunity and the right to peaceful dissent.
An Instagram reel framed Delhiโs October 2026 protest restrictions as worse than the Emergency. Reporting confirms mass policing, detentions and travel curbs, but its figures appear inflated and the historical comparison needs care. The central question is whether the restrictions on peaceful assembly were necessary and proportionate.
Author Series
From the 2023 election-commissioner appointment and legal-protection framework to voter-roll disputes, Delhi's CJP protests, detentions, the Tiranga March and a London demonstration, these connected records examine electoral accountability and the treatment of peaceful dissent. Verified restrictions and reported internal objections do not by themselves prove deliberate vote theft or politically directed suppression.

