MAIN MENU
Category Judiciary
Amit Shah was required to stay outside Gujarat after receiving bail in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case in 2010. Court records explain the order, his 2014 discharge and why allegations about Judge B. H. Loya’s death must not be treated as proven.
TAGS : Sohrabuddin Sheikh case
GEOGRPAHY : Gujarat
TYPE : Analysis
EVIDENCE : Partially Verified
UPDATED : 19 Oct 26 / 2:34 pm
No comments on Why Amit Shah Was Called ‘Tadipar’: The Gujarat Restriction, Sohrabuddin Case and Judge Loya Claims
A reel attributed to former interim CBI chief M. Nageswara Rao alleges the Modi government changed the law to shield itself from future investigations. Section 17A really did place an approval barrier before certain corruption probes, and Supreme Court judges split over its validity in 2026. The claim about the government's motive remains unproven.
After Dushyant Kumar Gautam was appointed Sikkim governor, Ankita Bhandari’s parents protested in Delhi and demanded that the appointment be paused while the CBI investigates an alleged VIP connection to her 2022 murder. Three men have been convicted; the accusations against Gautam remain unproven and he denies them. The dispute raises questions about constitutional immunity,…
ENTITIES : Ankita Bhandari murder case, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Dushyant Kumar Gautam
EVIDENCE : Context verified
UPDATED : 19 Oct 26 / 12:57 pm
Ahead of the 10 October 2026 Jantar Mantar protest, Delhi authorities restricted Metro access and cancelled many railway services. Subsequent court proceedings exposed the difference between planned closures and actual operations—and raised serious questions about whether security restrictions went too far.
GEOGRPAHY : Delhi
TYPE : Protest
EVIDENCE : Primary Source
PERIOD : 2026
UPDATED : 18 Oct 26 / 9:36 pm
A 9 October reel asks how Indians can exercise their right to protest when permission is refused even at designated venues. Delhi Police gave public-order reasons for rejecting a 10 October rally; the later closure of Jantar Mantar and Supreme Court scrutiny raise a harder question about whether workable space for dissent remains.
A reel links the 2023 suspension of Opposition MPs to legal protection for Election Commissioners and argues it now shields CEC Gyanesh Kumar. Parliament did pass the law amid mass suspensions, and Section 16 restricts court proceedings over official-duty acts. But its reach is not a blanket ban on investigations or arrests, and an alleged…
The Supreme Court's March 2023 interim panel included the Chief Justice of India. Parliament's later law replaced the CJI with a Cabinet minister nominated by the Prime Minister, giving the government side two of three seats. What the change means for independent elections, and where the 2026 court challenge stands.
From the 2023 election-commissioner appointment and legal-protection framework to voter-roll disputes, Delhi's CJP protests, detentions, the Tiranga March and a London demonstration, these connected records examine electoral accountability and the treatment of peaceful dissent. Verified restrictions and reported internal objections do not by themselves prove deliberate vote theft or politically directed suppression.
TAGS : Police Accountability, Election Commission independence, Right to Peaceful Protest, Election integrity, Freedom of expression, election-commission, Press Freedom
ENTITIES : Gyanesh Kumar, Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), Delhi Police, Election Commission of India, Supreme Court of India
EVIDENCE : Partially Verified
RANKINGS : Featured
CHECKOUT : CJP (Cockroach Janta Party)
UPDATED : 21 Oct 26 / 12:10 pm
A Beyond Bias reel records Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan calling police assaults on protesters “very, very distressing” and warning that professional detachment appears to be disappearing. Reporting corroborates his remarks, which place the July Jantar Mantar controversy inside a two-decade police-reform debate over professional independence, accountability and rights; they do not by themselves establish…
